<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark Kupferman&#039;s Blog &#187; Infosurv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kupferman.com/tag/infosurv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kupferman.com</link>
	<description>Kupferman.com is Mark Kupferman&#039;s home on the Internet featuring articles, reviews and comments on a variety of subjects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:42:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Survey Software vs. Online Research Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.kupferman.com/online-survey-validity-research-firms-jared-heyman.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.kupferman.com/online-survey-validity-research-firms-jared-heyman.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kupferman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infosurv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validity-of-online-research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kupferman.com/blog/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jared Heyman, president of Infosurv, recently published a white paper to&#160;Knowledgestorm.com entitled &#34;The Benefits of Hiring a Full-Service Online Research Firm &#8212; Software vs. Online Research Firms,&#34; in which he pretty much &#34;proves&#34; that survey software should only be used &#8230; <a href="http://www.kupferman.com/online-survey-validity-research-firms-jared-heyman.htm">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Jared Heyman, president of Infosurv, recently published a white paper to&nbsp;<a href="http://www.knowledgestorm.com/search/viewabstract/84436">Knowledgestorm.com</a> entitled &quot;The Benefits of Hiring a Full-Service Online Research Firm &#8212; Software vs. Online Research Firms,&quot; in which he pretty much &quot;proves&quot; that survey software should only be used for very simple, unimportant polls that don&#8217;t require a thoughtful methodology or unbiased execution. He says:</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p align="justify">Online survey software is well-suited for &quot;quick and dirty&quot; type surveys where&nbsp; directional quantitative or qualitative is needed. These surveys often run very short, with 20 or less items, and do not require the statistical accuracy that a full-service research firm can assure. An example may include a survey of twenty PTA parents to see what they would like the school to accomplish that year for their children, where only a rough tally of program preferences is required. Such surveys also do not require complex response validation, piping, or branching logic.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="ltr" align="justify">Although I agree with Jared on some points, I do think some of&nbsp;his assumptions don&#8217;t necessarily reflect the reality of today&#8217;s online survey software (many packages make it quite easy to validate responses or branch from question to question) and doesn&#8217;t take into consideration the access that many companies now have to thousands if not hundreds of thousands of customer e-mail addresses, along with the demographic data necessary to pull a meaningful, relevant sample. Sure &#8212; if you have no idea what to ask or if you don&#8217;t feel comfortable formulating questions &#8212; or even if you don&#8217;t have access to a good respondent pool &#8212; then it definitely makes sense to work with a professional agency. </p>
<p dir="ltr" align="justify">I wonder if there isn&#8217;t some middle ground for companies and organizations who have the in-house know-how to write acceptable questions but need some help analyzing the data; or maybe the analytical capabilities are in-house but a broad-based response panel is still needed because the in-house list isn&#8217;t adequate. In other words, given the current economic environment where companies can&#8217;t afford to do a lot of research if there isn&#8217;t a sizable market out there for research firms that are willing so sell their surveys a-la-carte at reasonable prices&#8230;as far as I know there are a few companies who will do this, and then there is <em>always</em> <a href="http://www.guru.com">www.guru.com</a>.</p>
<p dir="ltr" align="justify">Jared&#8217;s article is an interesting (albeit a little biased) read and&nbsp;covers many of the issues that you will have to think about when you conduct research yourself instead of hiring a firm. </p>
<p align="justify"><a href="http://www.knowledgestorm.com/search/viewabstract/84436">Read the&nbsp;white paper at KnowledgeStorm</a>&nbsp;(registration required).&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kupferman.com/online-survey-validity-research-firms-jared-heyman.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

