Orlando BMW Repair Recommendation

This week I brought my car to BMW Tech LLC in Orlando for a number of long-overdue repairs and adjustments. It is a small shop located off of Orange Blossom Trail just south of the BMW dealership. The service is amazing; the prices are fair and the owner/technician who worked on my car is about as honest and forthright as I’ve ever experienced. I wholeheartedly recommend BMW Tech LCC for anyone who needs BMW service or BMW repair in the Orlando area. Continue

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Mark Kupferman’s Blog

It felt kind of limiting only posting information about marketing research software at MarketResearchTech. So I’ve decided instead that it would be more fun to consolidate all of my posts at Kupferman.com. That way I can ramble on about any subject I choose without worrying whether or not I am on topic! Continue

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Leave a comment

The Salt Room (Orlando, Florida)

Some friends of mine are launching a new business in town called The Salt Room. It’s a new salt therapy treatment center which will be located in Orlando where folks with a variety of respiratory and skin diseases can come for relief of their symptoms. Basically, they have three rooms which are filled with salt — there is salt on the walls, on the floor, and in the air. And when you breathe it you get a concentrated feeling much like what you get when you breathe the salt air on the beach or in a deep salt cave.

Visit the Salt Room Orlando web site.

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Confirmit Flex Announced

Confirmit, one of the biggest online research software companies (they make the survey software that the big research firms use) has announced Confirmit Flex, a new application platform that makes it possible for the company to develop new applications for clients quickly, effortlessly and without disrupting the main Confirmit service that so many companies count on. Continue

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ruby Tabulation Software

Tim Macer of meaning ltd. wrote an article about Ruby Tabluation Software from the Australian firm Red Centre Software. I’ve always struggled way ways to automate the analysis and reporting on my ongoing surveys so I was intrigued. I signed up for the trial (they were very flexible — first they spent about an hour and a half with me on a webinar and then they let me try the full, unencumbered version of the software for more than a month) and fell in love with it. Continue

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PASW Statistics 18.0 (SPSS Statistics) New Features

SPSS has announced the new features that they plan to the upcoming release of PASW Statistics 18 (formerly know as SPSS Statistics 18, or SPSS Base).

[Note: New features of IBM/SPSS Statistics 19 have been announced] Continue

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

20 Questions a Journalist Should Ask About Poll Results

My apologies, gentle reader, for the fact that I appear to have fallen off the Earth for the past several months — work has been exceptionally busy, and I haven’t had much time to look at research ssoftware. I can tell you that right now I am using Qualtrics and having a great time with it.

In other news, I came across a particularly good article on the web site of the National Council on Public Polls by Sheldon Gawiser and G. Evans Witt entitled, “20 Questions a Journalist Should Ask About Poll Results.” Im not a journalist — but what I find particularly helpful about this article is that it helps me understand the way other people are viewing (or should be viewing) my research and gives me some great things to think about when I’m putting together my own projects.

Some of the key questions include:

  • Who did the poll?
  • Who paid for the poll and why was it done?
  • How many people were interviewed?
  • How were those people chosen?
  • What group were those people chosen from?
  • Are the results based on everyone who was interviewed?
  • How were the interviews conducted
  • What is the sampling error?

Etc, etc. There are 20 questions in all, and each question is followed by a detailed answer. To read the article, go to the NCPP web site.

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Survey Content Security Doesn't Exist

I received an interesting question from a reader earlier today about survey security. While I’m not actually answering his question here, it did raise an interesting point about online research — which is this: there really truly is no way to protect the content that you display in your survey from falling into the wrong hands. If you have a secret product or concept , your best bet for keeping it secret is not to test it using online research.

Before sending me the note telling me just how wrong I am, record the following:

As I figure it, there are four different kinds of security as it applies to online surveys. The first kind of security is what we’ll refer to here as back-end security. This basically means that strangers can’t simply log into the survey software server and start making changes to your survey, or download your data, or do all sorts of other things which really ought to be protected by a good password. Most survey systems do a pretty good job with this, assigning separate accounts, usernames, and passwords to each survey respondent. Some even take it to the next level, by allowing account administrators to set different permission levels for each user on the account, thereby ensuring that people who are meant to have access to your survey can’t “accidentally” go and make changes.

The second kind of survey security is where only authorized people are allowed to take your survey. Some implement this feature by giving you one respondent password that you can share will all of your respondents, or some systems even allow you to give every respondent their own password (or access key) which not only keeps out the riff raff, but also makes sure that each respondent can take the survey only once. This type of security not only ensure that only the “right” people take your survey, but also that the wrong people can’t get access to the content of the survey.

I’ve seen this kind of survey software security implemented well, but I’ve also seen it implemented poorly. Some systems, instead of assigning each survey an ID made up of a random collection of letters and numbers, use a sequential, easy to guess series. Which means that it really isn’t all that hard to view (and possibly edit!) surveys written by other clients of the survey system. So watch out for that.

The third kind of security about the connection between the respondent’s computer and the survey software server. Is it secure (look for the https: in the URL). Frankly, unless you’re doing super secret stuff and your concerned that hackers and government agents are trying to listen in on your respondents, I’m not sure it is something you need to worry too much about. But if you are afraid of industrial espionage or that someone is going to tap into your wireless signal, then you may want to take the precaution of choosing a system that allows for encrypted connections.

It’s easy enough for a well thought out survey software program to provide good security surrounding these first three measures. Where they get into trouble — and where you get into trouble if you believe them — is when they start to protect your survey content.

The fourth kind of survey software security is content protection, which basically means keeping your untrustworthy respondents from copying the top secret images and product descriptions that you include in your survey onto public web sites or your competitor’s email account.

I know, I know…there are survey systems that feature technologies that make it harder to copy images or capture video. This can be done using javascript, or by doing some crazy encryption to the feed. One could even go so far as taking over the computer so that nothing else works except the survey.

But I have a camera. And I have a video camera. And if you don’t completely lock down my computer, I have some really good screen capture software that lets me capture both audio, images and pictures. If I want to capture your survey content, believe you me, I will capture your survey content.

And then I can do pretty much anything I want with it, can’t I? No doubt 600-1000 people took that confidential survey of yours, and how are you going to know which one of them posted it to the anonymous message posting board using an anonymous IP address?

I suppose it is theoreticaly possible to embed a visual identifier into each image (a watermark of sorts) so you can trace the image back to whoever posted it online, but I’ve never heard of technologies built into survey software (if it does exist please let me know — I’ll report it here!).

There are also ways you can reduce the risk. You can, for example, use a pre-screened panel made up of people you trust. Employees, for example. Another approach is to threaten your respondents with legal action (although most will figure out pretty quickly that you have no way of identifying them). You could also threaten to stop doing online surveys if they leak your secret.

But the best way to ensure that your super secret new business idea doesn’t leak out onto the Internet is not to do online research (there, I said it). If your entire business model is based around keeping something confidential, do not put it in an online environment in front of strangers. Period. And don’t trust any research firm that says they have a foolproof method of keeping your images, video and other content safe. If they do, just pull out your camera or video camera and press record.

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Selecting the Right Respondents for your Survey (Setting your Quotas)

Not all respondents are created equal. It’s true. Just because you can convince someone to take your survey doesn’t mean you necessarily want them to take your survey. In fact, ensuring that the right respondents take your survey (in the right proportions) is probably among the most important things you can do to ensure that you finish your project with survey results that you can use. Continue

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

SPSS Statistics 17.0 Frustrates Me (a review)

I finally received my copy of SPSS Statistics 17 a couple of days ago and determined that I would try to push past my frustration with the “new and improved” Java-based interface and use it to analyze some data for a report I’m working on. But I can’t do it. There aren’t enough compelling features in the new version of SPSS to help me get past my frustration with the Java interface. So I’m sticking with SPSS 15. Continue

Posted on by Mark Kupferman | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment